My motivaton for writing this article was my (RG3K, op. UA3QDX) disqualification in CQWW CW-2008 and so-called "private" disqualification(?) in RDXC-2009.

Name: Valera    22.09.09
Callsign: LZ2CJ
If you want to make your point clear, find someone to translate this article in English for you.

Name: Al    23.09.09
Callsign: 4L5A
We translate UA3QDX article and I hope its looks better now  73            Al 4L5A

Name: Vytenis    25.09.09
Callsign: LY2KZ
As far as I understand, every suspicious log found by program is carefully examined by humans (contest committee) before it is claimed to be disqualified. No need to blame software. Did you mean as long as *THIS*computer log checking is used there will be no world/continental records set? Even at this low sunspot number. 73

Hide Comments

Name: Valeri    31.08.09
Callsign: LZ2CJ
Besides all that info the other BIG problem especially in Europe is running in the contest with 4 KW amps and even more. Excessive power is a well kept secret of some of top scoring EU stations in ALL categories. I would love to see all EU M/M stns running no more than 1500 W for example. Well done Al. Congrats. Valera LZ2CJ

Name: Christo    31.08.09
Callsign: LZ3FN
This guys ( uu7j ) are genious... but now enought to be not catch congrats for investigation looking forward to see more intresting discouveries about our "great " contesters Thanks LZ3FN

Name: Pa3k    01.09.09
Callsign: 9A5CW
Its time to publish CQWW Cheatbook? 73 to all

Name: Al    01.09.09
Callsign: 4L5A
Interesting data received from Andy UZ7HO with attention SU9HP log  I add it to article   I think that will be usefull for many contesters really you need to feel comfortable to ask DX for qso on another band specially with SO2R that can be easy   73          Al 4L5A

Name: Team    07.09.09
Callsign: HQ
File Received from Andy UZ7HO with additional analyze ... link does not work. 73

Name: Al    07.09.09
Callsign: 4L5A
Fixed

Hide Comments

When CQ WW DX Contest start open log policy many radioamateurs start examinate the logs and even some groups of radio amateurs is start making own analyze of the logs
Here you can see ananalyze provided to us by group of the contesters calling their self Group for Fair Contesting

Name: Peter    29.08.09
Callsign: DF3KV
Beside agreeing what you found at YU1LA log you write: "Log does not shows the frequencies. Nowadays, this can be just a case when same faults happen, or Intention that participant does not want to have exact frequencies in his log, for some reason. We strongly suspect that FQs are not shown to hide some violations of rules." I do not agree on that comment. Why should a station working unassistant have the transceiver connected to a computer? There is an eastern Europe contest which expects that too, a reason for me not to participate. I use older equipment as many, Drake C-Line, Icom IC-740 and IC-751 without interface. So don´t suspect I have no frequencies shown in my log to hide violation of rules!! This will apply to many others as well!! 73 Peter

Name: Al    29.08.09
Callsign: 4L5A
Peter I agree with you Authors of that analyze is not taking that to account and of course there is no requirement from CC that log need to include exact frequency and there is allways possibility to find freqs anyway using logs of other people Showing freqs of course is helping to check logs           73          Al 4L5A

Name: Al    31.08.09
Callsign: 4L5A
Authors of analyze is inform me that in provided analyze they are have some mistakes and ask me to replace it I decide to publish it like another analyze Analyze of 3V8BB log

Name: Al    01.09.09
Callsign: 4L5A
I receive this message from the group today :"We published PDF file with some analyzing in Excel file, where frequencies in log of 3V8BB were different then in correspondence log.  Unfortunately, it comes to us by accident from one group member (he did a mistake sending it) as this was one of very first analyzing, and group discover that most of correspondences had no CAT. Also this shown us how serious and deep in details this analyzing was done. This file was not taken in consideration in analyzing and all data in published analyzing are correct."      73           Al 4L5A

Hide Comments

Name: Goga    25.08.09
Callsign: SWL
Where 4L0A 16 M points disappeared?

Hide Comments

Name: Vaughn    19.10.09
Callsign: KE6V
You show LotW as an option for QSL. Could you confirm me 9/26/09 00:58 UTC 20 meters RTTY 599 so we do not have to exchange cards?

Hide Comments

Received results of CQ WW SSB 2008 there is several club stations DQed
UU7J,9A1P,9A7A,E7DX