3V8BB in CQ WW DX CW 2008

When CQ WW DX Contest start open log policy many radioamateurs start examinate the logs and even some groups of radio amateurs is start making own analyze of the logs
Here you can see ananalyze provided to us by group of the contesters calling their self Group for Fair Contesting

Name: Peter    29.08.09
Callsign: DF3KV
Beside agreeing what you found at YU1LA log you write: "Log does not shows the frequencies. Nowadays, this can be just a case when same faults happen, or Intention that participant does not want to have exact frequencies in his log, for some reason. We strongly suspect that FQs are not shown to hide some violations of rules." I do not agree on that comment. Why should a station working unassistant have the transceiver connected to a computer? There is an eastern Europe contest which expects that too, a reason for me not to participate. I use older equipment as many, Drake C-Line, Icom IC-740 and IC-751 without interface. So don´t suspect I have no frequencies shown in my log to hide violation of rules!! This will apply to many others as well!! 73 Peter

Name: Al    29.08.09
Callsign: 4L5A
Peter I agree with you Authors of that analyze is not taking that to account and of course there is no requirement from CC that log need to include exact frequency and there is allways possibility to find freqs anyway using logs of other people Showing freqs of course is helping to check logs           73          Al 4L5A

Name: Al    31.08.09
Callsign: 4L5A
Authors of analyze is inform me that in provided analyze they are have some mistakes and ask me to replace it I decide to publish it like another analyze Analyze of 3V8BB log

Name: Al    01.09.09
Callsign: 4L5A
I receive this message from the group today :"We published PDF file with some analyzing in Excel file, where frequencies in log of 3V8BB were different then in correspondence log.  Unfortunately, it comes to us by accident from one group member (he did a mistake sending it) as this was one of very first analyzing, and group discover that most of correspondences had no CAT. Also this shown us how serious and deep in details this analyzing was done. This file was not taken in consideration in analyzing and all data in published analyzing are correct."      73           Al 4L5A